Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Richard Gasquet vs Dominic Thiem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gasquet vs Thiem analysis and find out who is favored!
Richard Gasquet vs Dominic Thiem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gasquet has won 53.23% of points on his second serve, while Thiem has won 47.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gasquet, in recent form, has won 46.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Thiem has won 44.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.38% and 29.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gasquet has saved 59.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thiem has saved 56.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gasquet has won 47.76% of matches played (W/L 32/ 35), with Thiem winning 47.83% (W/L 22/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gasquet has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 80/ 41), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 248/ 164). Thiem has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 258/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 14/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Gasquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.52% of matches (W/L 20/ 11), where as Thiem has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gasquet has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.15 while Thiem has played against players with an average rank of 167.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gasquet has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thiem has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gasquet has converted 39.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thiem has converted 30.77% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gasquet 0 - 0 Thiem
N/A
Rank
High
37
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Richard Gasquet | Dominic Thiem |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (14/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (156/188) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 52 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 39 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:53:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 194.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (599/959) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (400/599) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (171/360) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 31% (24/78) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (339/977) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (6/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Richard Gasquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available
Dominic Thiem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Dominic Thiem
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
99)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Dominic Thiem
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Dominic Thiem
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Dominic Thiem
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Maximilian Marterer
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Dominic Thiem
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dominic Thiem
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Gasquet Vs Thiem Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
